NIA Court Declares Pakistan-Based Mushtaq Ahmad Mir Proclaimed Offender in Kashmir Terror-Funding Case
A special court of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in Jammu has declared Pakistan-based Mushtaq Ahmad Mir a proclaimed offender in a terror-funding case linked to the Al-Huda Education Trust (AHET) and the banned Jamaat-e-Islami organisation.
The order was passed by Special Judge Prem Sagar after the NIA sought action under Section 84 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). According to reports published on October 14, the court noted that non-bailable arrest warrants had previously been issued against Mir, but he had neither been arrested nor appeared before the court.
Mir is believed to be operating from Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, according to the case reporting.
What Is the Case About?
The investigation concerns alleged fundraising and the channelling of money through the Al-Huda Education Trust for Jamaat-e-Islami, which India declared an unlawful association in February 2019.
Investigators allege that funds were raised and used for activities associated with the organisation despite the ban. These allegations form part of the broader case being pursued by the NIA.
In August 2025, a special NIA court reportedly framed charges against three accused, including Mir and the trust, in connection with the alleged fundraising and use of funds.
The allegations remain subject to the judicial process. The declaration of a person as a proclaimed offender does not, by itself, amount to a conviction on the underlying charges.
Why Did the Court Declare Him a Proclaimed Offender?
According to published reports, the NIA had previously obtained non-bailable warrants against Mir. However, authorities were unable to secure his appearance despite prosecution efforts and the publication of notices in newspapers.
The court reportedly concluded that there was no immediate prospect of arrest and allowed the agency’s application under Section 84 of the BNSS.
Such proceedings allow courts to take formal action when an accused person fails to appear after the required legal process has been followed. The precise consequences depend on the applicable law and the court’s order.
What Happens Next?
The proclamation marks a further procedural step in the case, but it does not automatically conclude the investigation or trial involving the other accused.
Authorities may continue efforts to locate and apprehend Mir, while the case concerning the alleged use of funds remains subject to further court proceedings.
The development also highlights the challenges Indian investigators face when suspects in serious security-related cases are believed to be outside the country.
